Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now
Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now
| Blogs > Mtthunder406 > My Blog |
Fake profiles or catfish?
|
Fake profiles or catfish? |
|||
12/6/2019 12:10 pm |
I don't understand the question at hand itself. Fake profiles and catfish can be of the same thing OR they can be of separate things, depending on circumstances. There is no doubt that because of the deplorable condition of what society has become these days (pertaining to mostly the male sex) with rude behavior, ignorance, aggressiveness, idiocy, arguments, retort, retaliation and overall bullshit, hundreds of thousands of legitimate and willing women who used to be on this site have all disappeared OR now exist ONLY for online-only purposes. Being that Local Sexy Swingers is solely a business and women are the site's profit anchors, it had to find a way to continually find a way to generate profit, even with the lack of women here. How to accomplish that? Through illusion. So as the women fled from the site by the tens of thousands, they all had to be replaced by fake profiles to sustain the illusion that women are still abundant here (which they aren't). The point I make is that many fake profiles are created by the site itself for that illusion for profit, whereas catfish are merely a desperate 'second best' product of that recipe due to the lack of women here. Therefore, we're left with two separate circumstances.... 1.) Fake profiles created by the site for illusion/profit sake. 2.) Fake profiles created by men (catfish) for the purpose of getting their jollies off. Your poll really has no clarification on what we're even voting on and is rather confusing. Depending on what you're asking, fake profiles can be either a genius approach by the site itself for tricking and enticing an entire population of men into thinking that millions upon millions of women are abundant/willing to meet. At the same time, if we look at it from a catfish perspective, fake profiles are simply stupid. So again, your poll is too vague and gives no clarification on which sense or perspective we're viewing the matters from.
| ||
|
Just thoughts in general was my goal. A simple question, not a doctors thesis.
| ||
12/8/2019 11:39 am |
"Just thoughts in general was my goal. A simple question, not a doctors thesis." - Sounds a bit sarcastic. Even in general thoughts, the question at hand per this poll is too vague. Fake profiles/catfish can either be genius or lame, depending on what specific perspectives the author (you) is describing. And like I've explained, they can also both be one and the same things OR completely separate things, depending on who or what the source is for generating any said profile (i.e.: any average person [fake - catfish] or the site itself [fake - click bait]). Even in general thoughts, your poll is simply too vague and you're not going to get accurate votes because some people will be voting on the positive genius aspects of it when it comes to illusion for profit or deception, some will be voting on the negative lame aspects of it for average men simply being idiots and some critical thinkers like myself will see a combination of both aspects. I think your poll needs to better be explained in more specific detail for the voter to understand exactly what we're voting on and/or split up into two separate polls.
| ||
|
Are you a lawyer? Because your sure reading into my polls. Or Spock? Lol. And I am I not being logical? Those are simple questions with a yes or no answer, unless you read into them. And my replies are not sarcastic unless you assume they are. Are you good at overthinking things to a fault? Hmmm curious. Well k i k me if you wanna argue further. At.... Mthunder406....over and out.
| ||
1/6/2020 1:19 am |
Mtthunder406 - "Are you a lawyer? Because your sure reading into my polls. Or Spock? Lol. And I am I not being logical? Those are simple questions with a yes or no answer, unless you read into them. And my replies are not sarcastic unless you assume they are. Are you good at overthinking things to a fault? Hmmm curious. Well k i k me if you wanna argue further. At.... Mthunder406....over and out." There's no need to get salty toward me or have this defensive/retort type of attitude. It should be known that blogs and bloggers post things publicly for everyone to read, discuss thoughts, share ideas, opinions and overall to communicate. So whether it's criticism or not, any blogger should be able to handle all points of view from any adult chiming in here, so long as it's civil and respectful in nature. Am I a lawyer? No. Am I Spock? No. Are you being logical? Hmm, that's not a 'yes' or a 'no' answer because it's not applicable to begin with. It's not about logic. It's simply about being too vague. I've explained all of that already. "Or Spock?"... "And my replies are not sarcastic unless you assume they are.". Go figure how that isn't sarcasm. "Are you good at overthinking things to a fault?" - That's not how I approach anything in life. Whatever the circumstance, I handle it in a neutral and unbiased approach, take the info at face value for what it is or what it says and relay my logical thoughts on any given matter, no matter which way I lean. I comment on just as many positive and agreeable blogs as I do on those which I disagree on. Then there are some which I'm neutral or which I agree on parts of someone's blog/comment, but not on other parts. It's not to be thought of as "overthinking". What it really should be considered as, is 'critical thinking'. Something most of us in the present day seems to lack (and no, that's not directed at you, nor is it sarcasm). "Well k i k me if you wanna argue further. At.... Mthunder406....over and out." - This isn't at all an argument. If so, it's you who chose to create and label it as such. This is merely observation, respectful personal thoughts (regarding vagueness in poll criteria), opinion and discussion. And I don't K I K or anything else off site. That's described on my profile, but I assume you're a standard and don't have access to reading them.
|
Become a member to create a blog
